RSS The Daily Climb-Daily Posting Of Relevant Content

RSS BeforeItsNews Feed

RSS The Economic Collapse

RSS Zero Hedge Feed

RSS Confounded Interest Feed

RSS The Pete Morin Blog Feed

RSS Evil of indifference Feed

RSS The Thinker Feed

RSS Modeled Behavior Feed

RSS Politics and Computers Feed

RSS BlackListedNews Feed


RSS Franke Schein Survival Feed

RSS Homelessness In Savannah Feed

RSS Ye Olde Soapbox Feed

RSS The Daily Bail Feed

RSS Chaos Sweeps Away …. Feed

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 186 other followers


Legal Reality Newsletter – 2 February A. D. 2012

2 February A.D. 2012

Read the ticket before signing.

Sounds simple enough.

Read the ticket before signing.  Front side, back side, third side (if there is one).

Some of the STATEs are figuring out that “we’re” figuring out that they NEVER satisfy Due Process when it comes to Notice.

There is no Notice without the paperwork.  A judge can “tell” the defendant what the charge is until that judge is blue in the face, and nothing about Notice will have been satisfied.  Notice isn’t satisfied without the paperwork.

There’s a basic sequence of events.  First there has to be something actionable.  Then, a charge has to be made.  Then, a charging instrument has to be printed out (from the computer) and signed by the (at least “a”) witness.  (Clerks are not witnesses.  If a clerk is the charging witness, then that clerk can’t get anywhere near that case under the disguise of Custodian of Records, AND there’s some question as to whether the court, itself, is now the charging witness, given that the Clerk is the witness solely as a by-product of employment with the court.  More details at some other time.)  Then, that paperwork has to be served on the defendant “at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner” to as to allow a “meaningful opportunity to respond.”  

As a practical matter, how in the world does anyone enter a responsive plea until one has Notice of what one is charged with having violated?

To enter that plea is to waive Notice.

Where there is no Notice, to pretend that there is is to waive Notice.

To agree to enter that plea, any plea, may also constitute waiver of Notice.

Read the ticket.

Some jurisdictions are now including language in addition to the agreement to appear.  The agreement to appear is the equivalent of a personal recognizance bond.  Some people go into orbit over that thought.  That thought isn’t  worth much more than a passing glance, actually.  Without the personal recognizance bond, the ticketing officer has the authority also to become the arresting officer.  Some would-be defendants play the game that way.  They go to jail for a few days and the matter is dropped.  That’s not what makes good sense to this author, but to each his own.

The additional agreement language may have to do with entering a plea.

Where a form has language that one is not interested in agreeing to, the solution is to “negotiate” that form.  How does one “negotiate” a form?  By using a pen and drawing a line through the part that one isn’t interested in agreeing to.

To attempt to negotiate and to be told, “You can’t do that,” is to get evidence of “adhesion.”  Without the effort to negotiate, there is no “adhesion.”  The instant that negotiations are tried and not permitted, then there’s evidence of “adhesion.”  Where the negotiation is not objected to, then there’s nothing more agreed to than the timely appearance (whether by paperwork or also in person).  (Not agreeing to appear is not sensible. No doubt someone will press this to that limit.  If so, take good notes about what happened and be sure to share that experience.)

Read the ticket.

One does NOT have to agree to enter any plea.  Agreeing to appear is one thing.  Agreeing to enter a plea is completely another.

Read the ticket.  If necessary, “negotiate” that ticket so as to preserve the right of Due Process, starting with service of the paperwork containing the charges alleged.  If one agrees to enter a plea, because that’s the language pre-printed on the (back of) the ticket, the one may very well have waived one of the best defenses going:  violation of Due Process — no Notice.

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

Subscribe / unsubscribe :


Legal Reality Newsletter 25 January A. D. 2012

25 January A.D. 2012

One of the stabilizing influences for the “dollar” has been its use/position as the “world’s currency.”  That is no longer the case.

The nations listed below in this effort to move away from the “dollar” are also chief among the ones who have mounted the greatest political opposition to the “international banking cartel” based in Western Europe.  As more and more nations around the world come to realize the stranglehold intended by the “international banking cartel,” they, too, will move away from the diseased life-blood of that regime, namely the “dollar.”

They will have, ultimately, the exact same fate happen to them as is happening here in “church of United States,” in the event they, too, stay with any “funny money” system.  Should they opt away from the debt-based “currency” concept and back toward the asset-based Currency concept, they’ll avoid what’s about to happen “here,” and they’ll present the greatest, and actually the only, “defense” that exists against the attacks by the “funny money” promoters.

That’s going to take a while.

In the meanwhile, we’ll just see which marketplace activates that “defense” first.  We’ll have one more confirmation of Judgment if the Asian markets move to a Scriptural Money system before we do.  If we’re so blinded that we can’t apply God’s word until we see the other nations doing so, then we’re all the more severely under His Judgment.

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

Subscribe / unsubscribe :

——– Original Message ——–

Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:47:26 -0500

India Joins Asian Dollar Exclusion Zone, Will Transact With Iran In Rupees

Two weeks ago we wrote a post that should have made it all too clear that while the US and Europe continue to pretend that all is well, and they are, somehow, solvent, Asia has been smelling the coffee. To wit: “For anyone wondering how the abandonment of the dollar reserve status would look like we have a Hollow Men reference: not with a bang, but a whimper… Or in this case a whole series of bilateral agreements that quietly seeks to remove the US currency as an intermediate. Such as these: “World’s Second (China) And Third Largest (Japan) Economies To Bypass Dollar, Engage In Direct Currency Trade“, “China, Russia Drop Dollar In Bilateral Trade“, “China And Iran To Bypass Dollar, Plan Oil Barter System“, “India and Japan sign new $15bn currency swap agreement“, and now this: “Iran, Russia Replace Dollar With Rial, Ruble in Trade, Fars Says.”” Today we add the latest country to join the Asian dollar exclusion zone: “India and Iran have agreed to settle some of their $12 billion annual oil trade in rupees, a government source said on Friday, resorting to the restricted currency after more than a year of payment problems in the face of fresh, tougher U.S. sanctions.” To summarize: Japan, China, Russia, India and Iran: the countries which together account for the bulk of the world’s productivity and combined are among the biggest explorers and producers of energy. And now they all have partial bilateral arrangements, and all of which will very likely expand their bilateral arrangements to multilateral, courtesy of Obama’s foreign relations stance which by pushing the countries into a corner has forced them to find alternative, USD-exclusive, arrangements. But yes, aside from all of the above, the dollar still is the reserve currency… if only in which to make calculations of how many imaginary money one pays in exchange for imaginary ‘developed world’ collateral.

On India’s induction into…

Legal Reality Newsletter – Next Radio Program – 19/Jan/ A. D. 2012

19 January A.D. 2012

This evening, this author will be the guest on the two-hour program “The Rule of Law.”

The likely topics will include the private nature of “publicly funded” property and the recently released expose on the Murrah Building bombing in 1995 called “A Noble Lie,” a James Lane film.

From the home page


at the top, is a link for “Listen.”  It’s always Ok to try to listen in on a program ahead of time to make sure that the software necessary to process the feed is both installed and operational.

Also from the home page is a link to the Hosts and to the Shows, among other links through the home page.

Also still available is information about the show hosts at this link (Logos Network was formerly The Rule of Law Network):


Scroll down to “The Rule of Law.”

The archives at Logos are “by subscription.”

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

Subscribe / unsubscribe :

Legal Reality Newsletter 01/15/ A. D. 2012

15 January A.D. 2012

There may be more to the litigation, and if so, we’ll be able to match these concepts with that “final” ruling on the matter.

The 10th Circuit’s ruling is 100% consistent with our present legal reality.

The problem with these “anti-sharia law” efforts is that they’ve been “sabotaged” from the outset.  They were never intended to prevail.  They were intended solely as an outlet so that the “anti” voice could be slammed into the ground, so as to allow “marketing” on the concept that might not otherwise be possible.

Read the rest of this entry »

Legal Reality: Fwd: Eric Holder, Time to Pay Your Trentadues?

8 January A.D. 2012

Interesting that this information would be found at this site.

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

Subscribe / unsubscribe :

Legal Reality Newsletter – Next Radio Program

On Wednesday, 11 January 2012, this author will be the guest on America in the Balance on Truth in Focus internet radio from 4 – 5 pm Central time.

This is the first time this author will be addressing this particular audience.  Should be a great show.

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

Subscribe / unsubscribe :

Legal Reality Newsletter 11/30/ A. D. 2011

Harmon Taylor makes complex things so easy to understand. That’s why I’ve been getting his free newsletter for years.


30 December A.D. 2011

To the list:

Note how a perfectly correct understanding of the origin of the founding principles isn’t enough to understand how to interact with the present “Beast” system.

Baldwin, the minister, and his son, the attorney, are very committed, even rabid, “constitution-ists.”  This author’s brief exchanges with them in the past have been woefully unsuccessful in helping either of them come to terms with our present reality.  This author in no way pretends to be “the” source of information that will “cure” anyone’s “blindness” in this or any other “governmental” matter.  But, we’ll know when God cures the blindness, because the non-sense about the “constitution” will stop being promoted and advocated at least long enough that today’s commercial system is recognized for what it is and dealt with for what it is.

There’s zero question that the “constitution” intended to form a more perfect union for purposes of better preserving a “christian” (whatever that may mean, today) nation independent from any form or source of authority that tended toward tyranny.

Such system depends heavily upon “christian” self-government, with a heavy emphasis on “self,” as in the individual.  Where the individual “governs” himself in a particular line of thought, word, and deed, the community comprised of such individuals is very successfully “governed” via a “constitutional” system of the kind we’ve all been raised to think actually existed and still exists in America.

While a particular emphasis on “freedom” regarding worship of God is, without question, part of the ingredients that went into the mix that formed this nation, it can also be said that “the” purpose in acting on the concept of establishing a national government via a “constitution” was to organize a system by which tyranny was rendered illegal and practically impossible at the national level.

In the effort to prevent tyranny and to render tyranny illegal, there was one principle so overwhelmingly motivating that all others, including “freedom” to worship God, pale in comparison.  That one overriding principle was the issue of Money.  The “States” had “returned to Egypt” by circulating “Bills of Credit” as currency.  It was “the” early form of what passes today as “federal reserve notes.”  It wasn’t an asset or evidence of an asset being used as “money.”  It was a “debt” instrument.  The Founding Fathers recognized “immediately” what that meant.  It meant tyranny in the making.  So they did the unheard of and formed (at least in concept) a system at the national level, i.e., a step above, the “States,” which system rendered the circulation of “Bills of Credit” illegal.

It was a great idea.  As a practical matter, that effort kept “funny money” out of circulation until circa 1965, 1966, when the last vestiges of “silver certificates” were recalled, the silver coins were sucked out of circulation, and the “sandwich tokens” still called “coins” were first circulated.  That was about 170 years’ worth of “freedom” from overt tyranny via the circulation of “funny money,” originally known as “Bills of Credit.”

But, in this monumental effort, the Founding Fathers overlooked the obvious and didn’t nail down the one definition that truly would render tyranny, via taking over the Money system and perverting it into a “funny money” system, illegal and practically impossible.  The Founding Fathers never defined the unit of account.  They never defined “dollar.”  (Iceland is at the stage where they CAN define their “unit of account” in terms of grains of fine silver.  We’ll see if they have the sense and foresight to do so.)

If the Founding Fathers had defined “dollar” as a weight measured in terms of grains of fine silver, then it surely would be that much more impossible for anyone to show up over here and market (successfully) a privately-owned, “debt” instrument system as a substitute for honest weights and measures.  Surely there would have been a “hue and cry” the instant there was a change of any sort in that definition or for what passed as “currency.”  It’s precisely because “dollar” was not defined, in the “constitution,” that the door was left wide open for exactly what we’re dealing with “today.”

Not to worry.  That “oversight” was in no way accidental.  Nothing happens at that level of national leadership independent from the direct intervention of God, Himself.  The Founding Fathers were destined to fail in that extremely noble effort.  We, The Posterity, are the ones on whom has devolved the responsibility of putting that particular brick (back) into the foundation and walls of the “proper” governmental system and structure. 

So, despite the very correct connection between the concept of Biblical principles and the foundation for the “constitution,” which foundation is the Common Law, also known as the Law of the Land, the origin of which is Scripture, there persists to this day, in the teeth of the non-existence of anything even remotely Biblical about that which passes as “currency,” the notion that there exists, today, as we speak, a “constitutional” basis for that which passes as “government” in DC (and in the various STATEhouses).

To make the connection between Scripture and government is to recognize and confirm how everyone knows that there is not any “constitution” “in play,” or in any way relevant, to “governmental” activities at the national level, and, for that matter, at any level.

To understand what Money is and means in Biblical times is to zero in rapidly on one of the greatest confirmations that there is no “constitutional” system active today anywhere in the land, at any level of “government.”  (This reality is not limited to America.  Anywhere there’s “funny money,” there’s tyranny against those people, all controlled by the “banksters.”)

Some want, feverishly, to recognize validity in the original activities that have been marketed to us as sufficient to kick-start the “constitutional” system, based on which false presumption and teachings they then associate some later date to the demise of the “constitutional” system.  Some look to the 1965 time period, and directly after that, during which time the UCC came into existence for the STATEs.  Some look to the time period associated with removing selection of Senators from the STATEs and putting that into the hands of the people.  (That’s hugely significant, for where there are no States, it’s impossible to have a “Union of States.”)  Some look to the time period just before the War of Northern Aggression and the “sine die” adjournment of congress.  All of those lines of discussion miss the point completely, for they all presume into existence that which never was.  The reality is that the “constitutional” effort was flawed from the outset both substantively and procedurally.  It simply never was “admissible evidence of law.”  Where this or that part of the constitution is recognized as evidence of law, it’s because the Supreme Court has so recognized it.  Given that the “constitution” is a package deal, as in “all or nothing,” it follows that where any part is missing, it’s not just that part that’s missing but rather the whole that is missing.

What was the medium of exchange in Biblical times?  Right! Silver (and gold), whether in coined form or in bullion form.  To say silver was to say Money, and to say Money was to say silver.

In America, gold was taken out of circulation via FDR in about, what, 1933, 1935, somewhere in there. (It’s been revived, as confirmed by the “gold clause” cases in the last 1980’s, if memory serves.  Gold is recognized in “this state.”  Silver is not, but gold is.)  Silver was taken out of circulation under Johnson’s administration circa 1965.  “They” had to assassinate JFK to accomplish it, but “they” did assassinate him, and “they” did accomplish it.  As of the end of 1965, there were no more Biblical weights and measures in general circulation as Currency in America.  That which pretended to be “currency” was “funny money.”

Part of the “constitutional” plan is missing. Here, the missing part of focus is the general circulation of gold and silver Coin, and, even more to the point, their exclusive means of extinguishment of debt. 
Because we’re dealing with a “package deal,” where part is missing, the whole is missing.

There has never been a “constitution.”  For the immediate present, for those who just can’t picture the world without a “constitution,” it is sufficient for our present purposes of coming to grips with that system that pretends to have “governmental” authority that one recognize, and not just recognize, but internalize, the connection between Money and Scripture.  If we had a “constitutional” system, right now, today, i.e., if we had a system based upon Biblical principles, then we’d have gold and/or silver Coin in general circulation as our Currency.  Since we have no gold or silver Coin, especially the silver, in general circulation, we are not dealing with any system that looks to the Common Law, i.e., the Law of the Land, i.e., Biblical principles, as its foundational source of authority.

It’s difficult for the “feds” to confess and market and broadcast the difference(s) any more plainly.  Possible, but difficult.

It’s precisely because there is no (Biblical) system of honest weights and measures in general circulation that we know we’re not dealing with a “governmental” system that looks to the Law of the Land.  It’s precisely because there is no (Biblical) system of honest weights and measures in general circulation that we know we’re dealing with a system that looks to the Law of the Sea.  Under a (Biblical) system based on the Law of the Land, to circulate “funny money” as Currency isn’t merely fraud; it’s Treason.  Thus, where no one is going to jail, or worse, for circulating “funny money,” it follows that the system looks to the Law of the Sea, the only source/choice of law that tolerates “funny money.”

May The Lord God Almighty take this opportunity to cure some more cases of “blindness” when it comes to the reality of His Judgments via His “Beast” system, which system exists to devour and to destroy the rebellious.  

It is rebellion against God to use anything other than an honest system of weights and measures in our commercial activity.  We’re going to be stuck in this form and version of rebellion for so long as we continue to kid ourselves that it’s not a problem, much less evidence of rebellion.  We’ve spent our way into this one, and we can spend our way out, IF we’ll make the commitment to doing it God’s way.

Once again, this author applauds those business enterprises that have started allowing their customers, patients, patrons, and clients to extinguish the obligation(s) with honest weights and measures.  To state this once again, it’ll be the Mom and Pop shops, i.e., the family owned and operated business enterprises, that’ll lead this nation through one more of its darkest moments and eras.  Those are the enterprises most able to make that adjustment.

In sum, yes, let there be no confusion or doubt about the connection between the “constitution” and its source of authority.  The “constitution” looked to the Law of the Land, the origin and source for which is Scripture.  Absolutely right.

That being so plainly the case, why is it that it’s still so confusing to so many “constitution-ists” that we do not now have anything any remotely resembling a “constitutional” system, given that what screams at us for our pocketbooks is that which exists, specifically and intentionally, to deny and to defy God when it comes to honest weights and measures?  Individuals who use “funny money” without the slightest care in the world about what they’re really doing, from God’s point of view, are not self-governed individuals.  (To recognize the problem, whether one is in a position to do anything, at all, about it, immediately, hopefully leads to the ink dot on the forehead.  SeeEzekiel 9.  Regarding the apostasy that compels the “Passover”-like Judgment in Ez. 9, see Ez. 8.)

How does any group of people bring any nation into Judgment?  In other words, how have the “banksters” accomplished it?  Brilliantly!  They know Scripture better than we do!  They can see that the nations that were seduced into straying so far from Biblical principles as to commit “rebellion” are Judged by God Almighty, Himself.  All the “banksters” had to do was supply a means for that rebellion; hence, the “funny money.”  The rest has taken care of itself.  

(The additional forms of immorality zealously advocated and promoted through TV and movies aren’t helping, to be sure, but those seem to be accepted already as “individual choices.”  What we use as the medium of exchange is another “individual choice” we must recognize as a “choice” that exists and one that then must be exercised where possible.)

Yes, there’s some (slight) benefit to God’s having blinded us, but here we are, still facing life under tyrannical rule.  Unless we want more life under tyranny, we can no longer depend on that blindness as any form of “benefit.”  Nothing about this change in what we bring to the marketplace as Currency will come from “on high,” because those “on high” are the very people intent on perpetuating the rule via tyranny.  

That’s another way of saying that there are no “political” solutions.  The solutions are commercial, which means “individual,” and we just have to know that the choice exists and that how we “vote” with each transaction really does matter.  We “vote” for the international banking cartel as “king,” along with their system of tyranny with every transaction based on “funny money.”  We “vote” for God as King, and His system of Law, with every transaction based on honest weights and measures.

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

Subscribe / unsubscribe :