RSS The Daily Climb-Daily Posting Of Relevant Content

RSS BeforeItsNews Feed

RSS The Economic Collapse

RSS Zero Hedge Feed

RSS Confounded Interest Feed

RSS The Pete Morin Blog Feed

RSS Evil of indifference Feed

RSS The Thinker Feed

RSS Modeled Behavior Feed

RSS Politics and Computers Feed

RSS BlackListedNews Feed


RSS Franke Schein Survival Feed

RSS Homelessness In Savannah Feed

RSS Ye Olde Soapbox Feed

RSS The Daily Bail Feed

RSS Chaos Sweeps Away …. Feed

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 185 other followers



                    “HARVESTING WHAT?”

Knowing the history of the bureaucratic hardship imposed by the state of emergency in Agriculture didn’t help ease the reading of the article on the front page of the June 3rd, 2009 Denver Post. That state of emergency was declared in 1934 and is in effect, today. The article, titled “More farmers losing hope”, by Miles Moffeit told the story of financial hardship, stress from uncertain markets and of all things, a suicide prevention hotline for farmers. A study of agricultural history in the U. S. specifically, and the world in general, details the Corporatist seizure of the ability to produce food. When power and control override independence, we see this stress become the norm. At one time, farms were profitable and didn’t need the banks for anything. With the consolidation of the past 75 years, farmers are now the odd group on the outside, looking in. This is why farmers are under so much stress. Just as on every other inhabited continent, the corporate war is against them. The first action of tyrannical governments is to seize control of food production and use it as a weapon. As agriculture goes, so goes the nation. Forget General Motors.

The National Organization for Raw Materials (N. O. R. M.)  compiles a yearly table of production data, by area of production. It is a very good history of economic activity. The numbers are certainly very down in these days. With farmers being squeezed out and forced of the land, the work that should be the strength of the nation is under severe attack. While the urban public fails to defend their rural neighbors from corporate commercial attack, they should stop and think about where their food comes from. We must get past ignoring issues until they become a crisis. People will certainly take notice when food either is in short supply or costs twice what it did, a year ago.

Obviously, local independence is in our best interest. When the bottom lines of the banks became more important than the natural order of production and local distribution, the war was on for control of markets and land. This is why we must support farmers markets and local barter systems for goods and services. When we began accepting the paper Ponzi scheme, we became enslaved and exploited. We must understand that the fate of our neighbors is inseparable from our own. Looking for toll – free numbers to call or grant applications to fill out is a dead end in the same debt swamp that caused the original problem.

After decades of sowing debt and reaping poverty, the lesson should be clear. All of the experts with defective educations have led us to the edge of economic conquest by foreign interests. Consumers and farmers must defend each other from the attacks of the Globalist invaders. For too long, the combination of business and politics has invited invasion. Only by direct, local interaction can the outside oppression be excluded. Before Corporatist foreign agendas put farmers out of business and take food off the tables of America’s families, repudiation of the bureaucratic corporate structure must come.

We make choices, every day. At some point, our daily lives must surely must give rise to the need for better results. When do we question the logic of relying on institutions that don’t produce the required results? Delegating personal judgment to representation vulnerable to questionable influence is a recipe for disaster. The upside down and inside out Corporatist structure of this society and world creates more problems than it solves. Not only are decisions made according to private agendas of corporate global interests, but we are saddled with the burden of regulation toxic to local independence. Our neighbors are far more likely to have interests in common with us, than some convened body of public policy makers. That is the bedrock defense of a community against invasion by any organization. Certainly, those who believe the debt economy is a valid business model would not miss us, if we were gone. Being at the mercy of such treacherous mentalities is not an option, if we are to maintain civility and tranquility in our local relationships. We would do better to let the Globalist interests drift out to sea, without our support.


Oath of Office, Broken Wind

Oath of Office, Broken Wind

     The definition of an Oath of Office must be understood in the context of valid agreement. People are mesmerized by pomp and circumstance and do not question or examine the proper context. Such an oath is a public display of commitment to serve in a specified capacity. Over time, the duties incurred have been changed by who the individual has sworn to serve. The legal definitions of words have been multiplied, changed and misrepresented to protect the guilty.

People talk about change as a good thing. Real change in America began with a war of conquest and the Reconstruction Acts, the “New Deal” of it’s day. The Federal corporation, originally formed and commissioned to be confined to specific commercial administration activities has intruded into everyday life by monetizing people and commercializing all activity. This process has denied free people their humanity and failed in it’s commission as a guardian of independence and liberty. We are now ruled by the priorities of a private commercial agenda. No longer do we have the luxury of just weights and measures, equal protection under the law, and due process. As it has been said, some are more equal than others. The highest proprietary interest is now served. In the present corporate structure, an oligarchy owns the population. all commercial disputes are judged in favor of the management structure. In that context, an Oath of Office is now a commitment to serve the corporate structure in it’s management of legal trusts. People are now legal fictions. They are property.

Having been deprived of the right to own property, people are now subject to the revenue collection process. Not only are they vulnerable to loss of freedom and possessions, they must support and participate in a system that makes all property a collective asset. U. S. citizens now rely on a corporation to rob themselves and their neighbors in order to provide their needs. They are at the mercy of predators because they themselves are predators.

This may seem redundant. The point must be made and understood. Public officials have no loyalty to you, as an individual. You are a revenue source. When the Federal Reserve balances the books, you are in the accounts receivable column. Before their is nothing left of you, this fact should give pause for thought. We have enabled agents and legal mechanisms to accomplish the task of disposing of us and our wealth. Those agents have sworn an oath to accomplish that task, for the corporation. You are being liquidated. The currency is a tool used to separate you from property. There is no recovery for you as an individual. Hasn’t anyone noticed that we are being changed into a population of financial Dust Bowl people?

Hasn’t anyone noticed that continuous inventory is being taken of them? The effort to track every purchase and possession is relentless. A plague of surveillance cameras watch activity with unblinking eyes. The point will be reached when it will be impossible to have or do anything that is not recorded. At that point, an Oath of Office will be no more valid than the term, representation. The corporate structure uses the word representation, when it means to claim management authority. The departure from the most basic legal protections that we have relied on now make social processes an exercises in conquest. Do we question why we should be pitted against our neighbors in a commercial war? Do we question the premise that our well-being depends on conquest of others?

On a flow chart, the flow of wealth is exactly the opposite of what people believe it is. But again, appearances are deceiving. Everything in the financial news is the opposite of what people believe it to be.