Legal Reality Newsletter 11/30/ A. D. 2011Posted: December 30, 2011 | |
Harmon Taylor makes complex things so easy to understand. That’s why I’ve been getting his free newsletter for years.
30 December A.D. 2011
To the list:
Note how a perfectly correct understanding of the origin of the founding principles isn’t enough to understand how to interact with the present “Beast” system.
Baldwin, the minister, and his son, the attorney, are very committed, even rabid, “constitution-ists.” This author’s brief exchanges with them in the past have been woefully unsuccessful in helping either of them come to terms with our present reality. This author in no way pretends to be “the” source of information that will “cure” anyone’s “blindness” in this or any other “governmental” matter. But, we’ll know when God cures the blindness, because the non-sense about the “constitution” will stop being promoted and advocated at least long enough that today’s commercial system is recognized for what it is and dealt with for what it is.
There’s zero question that the “constitution” intended to form a more perfect union for purposes of better preserving a “christian” (whatever that may mean, today) nation independent from any form or source of authority that tended toward tyranny.
Such system depends heavily upon “christian” self-government, with a heavy emphasis on “self,” as in the individual. Where the individual “governs” himself in a particular line of thought, word, and deed, the community comprised of such individuals is very successfully “governed” via a “constitutional” system of the kind we’ve all been raised to think actually existed and still exists in America.
While a particular emphasis on “freedom” regarding worship of God is, without question, part of the ingredients that went into the mix that formed this nation, it can also be said that “the” purpose in acting on the concept of establishing a national government via a “constitution” was to organize a system by which tyranny was rendered illegal and practically impossible at the national level.
In the effort to prevent tyranny and to render tyranny illegal, there was one principle so overwhelmingly motivating that all others, including “freedom” to worship God, pale in comparison. That one overriding principle was the issue of Money. The “States” had “returned to Egypt” by circulating “Bills of Credit” as currency. It was “the” early form of what passes today as “federal reserve notes.” It wasn’t an asset or evidence of an asset being used as “money.” It was a “debt” instrument. The Founding Fathers recognized “immediately” what that meant. It meant tyranny in the making. So they did the unheard of and formed (at least in concept) a system at the national level, i.e., a step above, the “States,” which system rendered the circulation of “Bills of Credit” illegal.
It was a great idea. As a practical matter, that effort kept “funny money” out of circulation until circa 1965, 1966, when the last vestiges of “silver certificates” were recalled, the silver coins were sucked out of circulation, and the “sandwich tokens” still called “coins” were first circulated. That was about 170 years’ worth of “freedom” from overt tyranny via the circulation of “funny money,” originally known as “Bills of Credit.”
But, in this monumental effort, the Founding Fathers overlooked the obvious and didn’t nail down the one definition that truly would render tyranny, via taking over the Money system and perverting it into a “funny money” system, illegal and practically impossible. The Founding Fathers never defined the unit of account. They never defined “dollar.” (Iceland is at the stage where they CAN define their “unit of account” in terms of grains of fine silver. We’ll see if they have the sense and foresight to do so.)
If the Founding Fathers had defined “dollar” as a weight measured in terms of grains of fine silver, then it surely would be that much more impossible for anyone to show up over here and market (successfully) a privately-owned, “debt” instrument system as a substitute for honest weights and measures. Surely there would have been a “hue and cry” the instant there was a change of any sort in that definition or for what passed as “currency.” It’s precisely because “dollar” was not defined, in the “constitution,” that the door was left wide open for exactly what we’re dealing with “today.”
Not to worry. That “oversight” was in no way accidental. Nothing happens at that level of national leadership independent from the direct intervention of God, Himself. The Founding Fathers were destined to fail in that extremely noble effort. We, The Posterity, are the ones on whom has devolved the responsibility of putting that particular brick (back) into the foundation and walls of the “proper” governmental system and structure.
So, despite the very correct connection between the concept of Biblical principles and the foundation for the “constitution,” which foundation is the Common Law, also known as the Law of the Land, the origin of which is Scripture, there persists to this day, in the teeth of the non-existence of anything even remotely Biblical about that which passes as “currency,” the notion that there exists, today, as we speak, a “constitutional” basis for that which passes as “government” in DC (and in the various STATEhouses).
To make the connection between Scripture and government is to recognize and confirm how everyone knows that there is not any “constitution” “in play,” or in any way relevant, to “governmental” activities at the national level, and, for that matter, at any level.
To understand what Money is and means in Biblical times is to zero in rapidly on one of the greatest confirmations that there is no “constitutional” system active today anywhere in the land, at any level of “government.” (This reality is not limited to America. Anywhere there’s “funny money,” there’s tyranny against those people, all controlled by the “banksters.”)
Some want, feverishly, to recognize validity in the original activities that have been marketed to us as sufficient to kick-start the “constitutional” system, based on which false presumption and teachings they then associate some later date to the demise of the “constitutional” system. Some look to the 1965 time period, and directly after that, during which time the UCC came into existence for the STATEs. Some look to the time period associated with removing selection of Senators from the STATEs and putting that into the hands of the people. (That’s hugely significant, for where there are no States, it’s impossible to have a “Union of States.”) Some look to the time period just before the War of Northern Aggression and the “sine die” adjournment of congress. All of those lines of discussion miss the point completely, for they all presume into existence that which never was. The reality is that the “constitutional” effort was flawed from the outset both substantively and procedurally. It simply never was “admissible evidence of law.” Where this or that part of the constitution is recognized as evidence of law, it’s because the Supreme Court has so recognized it. Given that the “constitution” is a package deal, as in “all or nothing,” it follows that where any part is missing, it’s not just that part that’s missing but rather the whole that is missing.
What was the medium of exchange in Biblical times? Right! Silver (and gold), whether in coined form or in bullion form. To say silver was to say Money, and to say Money was to say silver.
In America, gold was taken out of circulation via FDR in about, what, 1933, 1935, somewhere in there. (It’s been revived, as confirmed by the “gold clause” cases in the last 1980’s, if memory serves. Gold is recognized in “this state.” Silver is not, but gold is.) Silver was taken out of circulation under Johnson’s administration circa 1965. “They” had to assassinate JFK to accomplish it, but “they” did assassinate him, and “they” did accomplish it. As of the end of 1965, there were no more Biblical weights and measures in general circulation as Currency in America. That which pretended to be “currency” was “funny money.”
Part of the “constitutional” plan is missing. Here, the missing part of focus is the general circulation of gold and silver Coin, and, even more to the point, their exclusive means of extinguishment of debt.
Because we’re dealing with a “package deal,” where part is missing, the whole is missing.
There has never been a “constitution.” For the immediate present, for those who just can’t picture the world without a “constitution,” it is sufficient for our present purposes of coming to grips with that system that pretends to have “governmental” authority that one recognize, and not just recognize, but internalize, the connection between Money and Scripture. If we had a “constitutional” system, right now, today, i.e., if we had a system based upon Biblical principles, then we’d have gold and/or silver Coin in general circulation as our Currency. Since we have no gold or silver Coin, especially the silver, in general circulation, we are not dealing with any system that looks to the Common Law, i.e., the Law of the Land, i.e., Biblical principles, as its foundational source of authority.
It’s difficult for the “feds” to confess and market and broadcast the difference(s) any more plainly. Possible, but difficult.
It’s precisely because there is no (Biblical) system of honest weights and measures in general circulation that we know we’re not dealing with a “governmental” system that looks to the Law of the Land. It’s precisely because there is no (Biblical) system of honest weights and measures in general circulation that we know we’re dealing with a system that looks to the Law of the Sea. Under a (Biblical) system based on the Law of the Land, to circulate “funny money” as Currency isn’t merely fraud; it’s Treason. Thus, where no one is going to jail, or worse, for circulating “funny money,” it follows that the system looks to the Law of the Sea, the only source/choice of law that tolerates “funny money.”
May The Lord God Almighty take this opportunity to cure some more cases of “blindness” when it comes to the reality of His Judgments via His “Beast” system, which system exists to devour and to destroy the rebellious.
It is rebellion against God to use anything other than an honest system of weights and measures in our commercial activity. We’re going to be stuck in this form and version of rebellion for so long as we continue to kid ourselves that it’s not a problem, much less evidence of rebellion. We’ve spent our way into this one, and we can spend our way out, IF we’ll make the commitment to doing it God’s way.
Once again, this author applauds those business enterprises that have started allowing their customers, patients, patrons, and clients to extinguish the obligation(s) with honest weights and measures. To state this once again, it’ll be the Mom and Pop shops, i.e., the family owned and operated business enterprises, that’ll lead this nation through one more of its darkest moments and eras. Those are the enterprises most able to make that adjustment.
In sum, yes, let there be no confusion or doubt about the connection between the “constitution” and its source of authority. The “constitution” looked to the Law of the Land, the origin and source for which is Scripture. Absolutely right.
That being so plainly the case, why is it that it’s still so confusing to so many “constitution-ists” that we do not now have anything any remotely resembling a “constitutional” system, given that what screams at us for our pocketbooks is that which exists, specifically and intentionally, to deny and to defy God when it comes to honest weights and measures? Individuals who use “funny money” without the slightest care in the world about what they’re really doing, from God’s point of view, are not self-governed individuals. (To recognize the problem, whether one is in a position to do anything, at all, about it, immediately, hopefully leads to the ink dot on the forehead. SeeEzekiel 9. Regarding the apostasy that compels the “Passover”-like Judgment in Ez. 9, see Ez. 8.)
How does any group of people bring any nation into Judgment? In other words, how have the “banksters” accomplished it? Brilliantly! They know Scripture better than we do! They can see that the nations that were seduced into straying so far from Biblical principles as to commit “rebellion” are Judged by God Almighty, Himself. All the “banksters” had to do was supply a means for that rebellion; hence, the “funny money.” The rest has taken care of itself.
(The additional forms of immorality zealously advocated and promoted through TV and movies aren’t helping, to be sure, but those seem to be accepted already as “individual choices.” What we use as the medium of exchange is another “individual choice” we must recognize as a “choice” that exists and one that then must be exercised where possible.)
Yes, there’s some (slight) benefit to God’s having blinded us, but here we are, still facing life under tyrannical rule. Unless we want more life under tyranny, we can no longer depend on that blindness as any form of “benefit.” Nothing about this change in what we bring to the marketplace as Currency will come from “on high,” because those “on high” are the very people intent on perpetuating the rule via tyranny.
That’s another way of saying that there are no “political” solutions. The solutions are commercial, which means “individual,” and we just have to know that the choice exists and that how we “vote” with each transaction really does matter. We “vote” for the international banking cartel as “king,” along with their system of tyranny with every transaction based on “funny money.” We “vote” for God as King, and His system of Law, with every transaction based on honest weights and measures.
Harmon L. Taylor
Subscribe / unsubscribe : firstname.lastname@example.org